- Rohan wrote a thought-provoking post over the weekend suggesting that communities are too focused on business models. As exhibit A, he noted that even the notorious WoW forums largely stick to complaints about the actual game, while non-subscription titles like SWTOR have forums full of threads complaining about the business model.
- Psychochild is continuing his discussions about how MMO's are losing their stickiness, why players may be to blame, and how the resulting impact on revenue may also be rendering the genre financially unsustainable. (Scott Hartsman is also making this case 140 characters at a time on Twitter - someone buy the man a blog? :))
A sidenote to Rohan's business model thread is that WoW's business model has changed relatively little since its launch over eight years ago, or indeed even since the older MMO's from the decade prior. The game makes money when people stay subscribed, people cancel their subscriptions when they run out of stuff to do, so clearly the answer to the question is to provide an unending supply of stuff to do. The reasoning is sound but apparently misdirected.
As Psychochild notes, the virtual world style MMO's of last decade were a different beast. These products emphasized long-term goals over short-term fun and community over convenience. On paper, the daily grind brings people into the game every day and thereby increases their interaction with the community. In practice, the sheer repetition of the daily grind de-emphasizes community - people burn out and are forced to lean more heavily on strangers to fill out their required daily groups - and instead emphasizes repetitive gameplay that will always struggle to compete with a crowded marketplace including increasingly deep and online-enabled single-player games.
In short, Blizzard may have gotten exactly what they asked for - people who ground dailies, scenarios, dungeons, LFR, pet battles, etc until they couldn't take anymore. Worse, because the only financial feedback in their model is to quit the game outright, the only feedback they got was when they started losing subscribers by the millions. Under a non-subscription model they might have gotten the message that people were getting tired of dailies before people were irreparably burned out - or at least made more money off of the players in question before they left.
Funny how our spending habits may mirror our response to in-game incentives - it's much easier to get what you ask for than what you actually want.